Monday, July 23, 2007

Blatant violations of UNSC1701


Today there was an article in the Jerusalem Post online version that states that Hizbullah could have attack Israel anywhere and still has the capabilities.

This is a blatant violation of the UN Security Council resolution 1701, and it is funny that no one publishes this type of thing in newspapers all around the world. Only when Israel can be seen as an aggressor does the articles make it all over the internet and printed media.

Today there was an article about US trade unions blasting the UK trade unions about the boycott, saying how so many atrocities are occurring throughout the world but yet they single out one country, that cant be very objective can it be?

In the picture I posted above, this is absolutely disgusting, children and civilians standing around a katyusha launcher owned by Hizbullah, What the hell are children and civilians doing around a terrorist group's armaments? If they stand around to check the stuff out, what is the chance that civilians are around when Israel targets things like this during war?

This type of picture just shows that Hizbullah want civilians and children around in case Israel attack and then journalists like this one from AP can take the necessary pics and post how brutal Israel is...on the other hand why is this journalist not informing the UN about this breach of UNSC 1701?

There are so many breaches by Hizbullah but nothing gets done about it, except for the internal deals made by the UN troops with Hizbullah like the one made after the spanish UN soldiers were killed. The Spanish commander said that the deal was to give Hizbullah intel on condition they do not kill anymore UN troops.

Well the UN are not doing their job and putting Israel's security at risk, the media love to blame everything on Israel, Ahmadinejad visited Assad and gave him some inspirational words and probably threatened him, if he dares make peace with Israel.

But only time will tell, fun times coming in the future...Watch this Spot

Monday, June 18, 2007

Rockets flying in from all directions onto Israel

Last Night I had the fortunate opportunity to read an article that stated that lebanon was in breach of UNSC resolution 1701, due to the fact that someone unknown to the lebanese shot a few barrages of Katyusha Rockets into Northern Israel, it shows how ignorant the lebanese government is and the UNIFIL who are not watching the border, this rocket attack also shows that the UN are not doing their job as someone is getting hold of arms from somewhere and that would also be in breach of UNSC 1701.

UNIFIL

luckily Kassam rockets from Gaza have stopped, but seeing as Israel has closed all borders to Gaza many palestinians want to get the hell out of gaza as they do not want to be under Hamas' rule, that is funny, why now are they not wanting to be under hamas' rule but they voted in hamas with "democratic elections" funny. Then Mr Abbas dissolves the government and declares a new one, funny that seems like a democracy, does it not?

PA is not a democracy but run by a dictator, and Israel is caught in the middle. Israel is the aggressor, what a joke, does this sound like an aggressor?

On Sunday, the IDF distributed water and food to the hundreds of Palestinians who had gathered at the Erez Crossing hoping to be allowed into Israel. JPOST
The PA can not even govern its own people and the "occupier","aggressor" or whatever you call Israel is nothing close to that.

All I see is Israel being sensitive to the palestinians as always and the palestinians forgetting the hand that feeds them. It is funny how the Israelis always come to the aid of the palestinians, UNRWA has left Gaza, Aid workers have left gaza so on and so forth, but it is the "insensitive enemy occupier" that is always there never forgetting about the palestinians, and helping them while the world watches and says nothing, but wait for the day that Israel pound gaza in order to help the palestinians they all forget about the good which Israel does for them and they have rallies in order to blame everything on the Israelis.

Bottom line is that the palestinians are ungrateful and more ungrateful.

It is funny how Fatah always send Israel messages via another country to ask for Israel's help and then once help is on its way and the mission is successful, the palestinians are firing rockets into Israel, or shouting curses at Israel. Israel please help us

While the world watches and knows how much Israel help the palestinians, they have the audacity to bend the truth in order to make Israel look bad.

These supporters of terrorists must wait for there turn and you know who wont bear a grudge and come help, Israel and the US, as they have done in the past

Wednesday, June 13, 2007

Hamas, The peaceful ideology behind the group

Peaceful, nothing could be further from the truth,

Israel will exist and will continue to exist until Islam will obliterate it, just as it obliterated others before it" (The Martyr, Imam Hassan al-Banna, of blessed memory).

The Islamic Resistance Movement believes that the land of Palestine is an Islamic Waqf consecrated for future Moslem generations until Judgement Day. It, or any part of it, should not be squandered: it, or any part of it, should not be given up.
There is no solution for the Palestinian question except through Jihad. Initiatives, proposals and international conferences are all a waste of time and vain endeavors.

After Palestine, the Zionists aspire to expand from the Nile to the Euphrates. When they will have digested the region they overtook, they will aspire to further expansion, and so on. Their plan is embodied in the "Protocols of the Elders of Zion", and their present conduct is the best proof of what we are saying.
Hamas Charter of 1988

How can Israel be obligated to try make peace with a group that does not recognise Israel's right to exist.

As JP said in a comment to Walton Pantland that when Hamas recognises Israel, past agreements and denounces violence, Israel will accept the government.

Must Israel make peace with every new government that is elected? how stupid would that be. Are Hamas better palestinians than Fatah or vice versa?

Walton Pantland says Israel is to blame for everything as they did not accept a democratic election which brought hamas to power, that is wrong as Israel has said absolutely nothing of the type of election or about the outcome, all they say is if the hamas government want to be recognised then they must abide by 3 rules which JP has stated.

Why must Israel recognise hamas if they do not recognise Israel? why should Israel respect past agreements if hamas does not want to, but Israel does respect those agreements, eventhough a new government is in power.

This infighting reminds me of the wars between the Xhosa and the Zulus.

Maybe here is a solution 'EU would consider Gaza military role'
yeah right just like the UN is stopping arms to hizbullah.

or maybe a 3 state solution

the problems get more and more for Israel and they are blamed for it.

All I see is a country-Israel- wanting to live in peace and harmony with its neighbours, keeps its nose clean and never attacks only defends, Syria mobilising on the Golan Heights, Hizbullah re-arming in lebanon, palestinians fighting and bringing the fighting closer to the lebanese- Israel border and also the civil war in gaza and probably soon in the west bank.

Israel is caught in the middle and is probably going to get attacked as usual, which will spark a war which everyone will probably blame Israel for starting.






'Palestinians comitting war crimes'

In internal Palestinian fighting over the last three days, both Fatah and Hamas armed forces have summarily executed captives, killed people not involved in hostilities, and engaged in gun battles with one another inside and near Palestinian hospitals.

"These attacks by both Hamas and Fatah constitute brutal assaults on the most fundamental humanitarian principles," said Sarah Leah Whitson, Middle East director for Human Rights Watch. "The murder of civilians not engaged in hostilities and the willful killing of captives are war crimes, pure and simple."

Where are the reporters of South African media? They are not writing about this stuff. Where is Ronnie Kasrils and his cronies? What about our government condemning what the palestinians are doing.
None of these stories even make it to news broadcasts, but if Israel was involved that would be a different story, is that not true?

Just shows how screwed up and one sided the policies of our government are. It is so funny that hundreds of thousands of people are in solidarity with the palestinians, but turn a blind eye to what is happening in so called palestine and now that Israel is nowhere close to the fighting they keep quiet until an opportunity arises where they can blame Israel for the problems the palestinians have.
The funny thing is that anti-Israel lobbiests will probably find away of bending the truth in order to find a way of blaming Israel in the collapse of the PA government.

If the South African government actually cared about the palestinians do you not think they should have told the palestinians that a unity government does not work ever. South Africa did the same mistake and the unity government fell through big time.

How can you have a government where the majority want Israel destroyed and the other want peace, do you really think that type of government will work?

We now have the answer and it is a definite "NO" and the world and all the Anti-Israel lobbiests should wake up and look what is happening and think to themselves was their stupid fight for the palestinians worth it?

The palestinians are back stabbing all those people who have sent rallies and marches in their favour, trying to fight for their right to exist, looks like those people were fooled into the real agenda of the palestinians.

From the way these terrorists act and still have the support of many countries world wide it seems these countries need to really start thinking are they supporting the good guys are the bad eggs.

Where is the UN ? Where is the SAHRC ? Where is COSATU? Where is EU? and the list goes on and on all those that condemn Israel in what they do but turn a blind eye to what the palestinians are doing.

Our government is so two faced they are probably keeping quiet because the policies are not going the way they thought.

Let us see how long it takes for the palestinians to fire on Israeli civilians in order to get Israel involved and then the world condemning what Israel is doing. Happens all the time, Shame on those people, just remember what goes around comes around.

Source of quote

Tuesday, June 12, 2007

Walton Pantland, you like changing the topic don't you? come lets have a debate

Walton said...

A couple of points:

Yes, I have been to Israel, in fact I lived there for a year and speak Hebrew - though it's getting rusty. I arrived in Israel more or less a Zionist, but quickly changed my mind when I realised Israel was just like apartheid South Africa. Quite frankly, I am fairly confident that I know what I am talking about.

But go ahead and call me anti-semitic if that's the only way you can confront my arguments. That is a typical Zionist tactic: discredit your critics by calling them anti-semitic, debate semantics (is it really occupation?), or point to how bad other states in the Middle East are.

As for Israel targetting civilians, this is widely reported in media such as The Guardian and BBC, though I am sure you will just denounce these as pro-Palestinian anti-semites. I am sure you are aware that Israel has also murdered a number of peace activists, such as Rachel Corrie.

I didn't leave South Africa because I was 'scared of the blacks', in fact I joined the ANC in 1992 and I have been fighting for broad-based Black empowerment ever since.

You say:

"I am under the impression that Israel captured Jerusalem, West Bank, Gaza, Golan Heights fair and square so where is the occupation? It is Israel's property, and in my eyes up to the government and referendums to do with it as they please, is this not right?"

Uh, no. I don't accept that conquest gives Israel a right to land in the Middle East, and neither does the UN, so saying Israel won the land 'fair and square' is pretty pointless. If I come and beat you up and take your house because I have a bigger gun than you, does it become my house because I won it 'fair and square'? If so, where do you live?

The fact that other states in the Middle East are as bad as Israel is not a justification of Israeli tyranny. Being an enemy of Israel doesn't make me an friend of Syria - I am an enemy of both, if you can understand the complexity of that nuance.

Quite frankly, I think we could do without Israeli arms, and Win XP.

The reason I compare Israel to apartheid has a lot to do with people like you - the kind of language you use is identical to that of pro-apartheid whites in the 1980s and early 1990s. You say "Israel has bent over backwards for the palestinians and the thanks in return are suicide attacks, home made rockets, road side bombs and the list goes on and on." That's exactly what white South Africans used to say about black people. They also used to point to the rest of Africa - the way you point to other Middle Eastern countries - as a reason for continuing apartheid.

And Its Almost Supernatural is another blog full of Zionist rubbish.

And by the way, if you are going to steal an entire post from my blog, please at least have the decency to link back to it.

June 11, 2007 6:15 PM
Mr Walton, I do not plagiarize, everything I use has its source if you actually had looked with your eyes and not what you sit on you would have seen above "here is my reply" the source of your article with the address, I take offence to your accusations, about me calling you an anti-semite as I never did and also saying that I stole your article.

Just because this discussion is not going your way does not mean you must get defensive and horrible.

you say that you "quickly changed your mind when you saw Israel was like apartheid South Africa", what do you mean by that, you cant just say something and then change the topic without maybe giving some examples.

"Uh, no. I don't accept that conquest gives Israel a right to land in the Middle East, and neither does the UN, so saying Israel won the land 'fair and square' is pretty pointless. If I come and beat you up and take your house because I have a bigger gun than you, does it become my house because I won it 'fair and square'? If so, where do you live? "

I wonder what history books you read? As Nasser said in 1967 "Arab Nations must come together to destroy the Jewish state" and they amassed over 100 000 troops in the sinai desert, more troops from Sudan, Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Syria and closed the straits of tiran, if that is not an act of war and seeing as the Israeli population comprised of about 2.5 million Jews most of them refugees from Europe did not want to see another holocaust, so when you say this was a conquest, I think you are talking absolute junk.

It is very funny your analogy, it means bugger all, Israel was about to be attacked and out of self defence they managed to gain the upper hand. I would think that Israel did not have the bigger guns as the USSR were just sending the arabs arms left right and centre.

In all the wars against Israel please inform me who started? I can assure you the last thing that Israel wants is war, all they want is peace and they try oh so hard but if you don't see that you never will.

as we see in the latest civil war (Which Israel probably started hey walton) they can't even keep agreements between themselves, they have gun battles in houses, hospitals, government buildings, at funerals, in the streets. How can you try make peace with someone else if you don't have internal peace?

Rachel Corrie, poor girl, but why you blaming Israel for it? her body was in pretty good shape if a D9 drives over you twice most of your body would be on the tracks, I know I have seen tracks after an encounter with hizbulla terrorists pointing RPG's at us -while I was stationed in lebanon- and we only drove over them once with Merkava Mark-IIIB.

try your excuses and try put the blame on Israel as many times as you want, but you always elude the fact about the innocent civilians killed by palestinian terrorists.

You make many allegations about me, which are all baseless, I am putting forward an argument and all you can say are things to try make me look like the bad guy, it was you that said no one ever wants to engage in a nice debate, but how do you want anyone to engage in a debate with you when you put words in their mouths.

Your views are so distorted, you say something but you never back it up. the way you write shows that YOU an not take criticism and think that your view is right and anyone who says otherwise are attacking you and you get horrible.

"I didn't leave South Africa because I was 'scared of the blacks', in fact I joined the ANC in 1992 and I have been fighting for broad-based Black empowerment ever since."

I never said you were "scared of blacks", I was proving a point about how you assume all your views, I see you are doing a wonderful job for the ANC, not. If you were such a good ANC activist, then why do you speak against the politicians who are your comrades?

"The fact that other states in the Middle East are as bad as Israel is not a justification of Israeli tyranny. Being an enemy of Israel doesn't make me an friend of Syria - I am an enemy of both, if you can understand the complexity of that nuance."

Excuse me, tyranny???? what are talking about? Israel is the only known democracy in the Middle East. Israel has never attacked any neighbour without being provoked and provoked time and time again. If you hate everyone how can you have an objective view, I do not understand that?

For you to say you base your opinion on comparing Apartheid to Israel because of people like me, that is very stupid because the amount I know about apartheid is so little I do not even try to justify it or the opposite, one thing I do know is to compare Israel to Apartheid is actually degrading the experience that a black person who really suffered during apartheid.

It would something like comparing what happened at the Virginia Tech to the Holocaust, baseless and horrible.

Please can I have some proof of blacks firing homemade projectiles into Cape Town from Gugs or khayelitsha or JHB from Soweto or kidnapping SANDF soldiers or blowing up buses.
There is one problem, Blacks were citizens of South Africa. Palestinians are not citizens of Israel and as I said before Israeli-Arabs have the same benefits as any ordinary Israeli citizen.

I do not see you comparing the lebanese government to apartheid? they are definitely doing a bit of ethnic cleansing, do you know that certain jobs in lebanon can not be given to a refugee? it is not only in lebanon but most arab countries, who have tyrants running the country.

Your comparisons are so far fetched that you forget about who is the real instigator to this crisis and the palestinians are just pawns in the chess game of the other arab nations.

It is funny how even after you were in Israel you can have these types of feelings, when did you go? My muslim doctor that I go to, said to me how he hated Israel and when he got there understood how much brainwashing he was subjected to by his imam. He was never searched once during his 1 month stay, he told me the countless walks along the Tel Aviv promenade and the hospitality that he was given, gave rise to him investigating a little bit more, and he came to the realisation that, Israel is not the enemy and actually it is a great place to live.

Another thing just because you disagree with something it does not mean it is rubbish, how can you say you want to debate when your answer is always, that's rubbish or saying something and not elaborating.

debate (source: http://www.answers.com/debate)

verb

    To put forth reasons for or against something, often excitedly: argue, contend, dispute, moot. Seeaffirm/deny/argue, words.

noun

  1. A discussion, often heated, in which a difference of opinion is expressed: altercation, argument, bicker, clash, contention, controversy, difficulty, disagreement, dispute, fight, polemic, quarrel, run-in, spat, squabble, tiff, word (used in plural), wrangle. Informal hassle, rhubarb, tangle. See conflict/cooperation.
  2. The presentation of an argument or arguments: argumentation, disputation, forensics. See affirm/deny/argue, words.
No where do I see attacking a person is a debate, so once you can engage in a proper debate and put forward proper arguments and not mere hearsay then maybe we can have a nice debate.

I am willing you must stop attacking because that just shows that your arguments are just unfounded and mere baseless information .

Monday, June 11, 2007

This is to Mr Walton Pantland

Make Israel history

Israel's victory in the Six Day War is the single biggest cause of conflict in the world today.

It's the fortieth anniversary of the Six Day War, and the beginning of the Israeli occupation of Palestine. This war, probably more than any conflict, has poisoned world politics ever since. I would argue that it's probably the single biggest cause of conflict in the world today, which is why I blog about it so much.

Here is an Amnesty International report about the devastating effects of 40 years of occupation.

I am as disturbed by the rise of militant Islam as anyone, but I think that it is the injustice done in Palestine that is the cause, and only creating a just solution will take away the Islamic fundamentalists reasons for existing. We are facing a so-called 'clash of civilisations', between Islamic and Western values.

But its Western hypocrisy that Muslims are rejecting, and the Israeli occupation - and US support for it - is what has made Islam the enemy of the West.

I had a scrap on the Zionist blog today. The readers of the blog find it impossible to concede that I can criticise Israel without being an anti-Semite. "This Palestinin crap is just another stick to beat Jews with", as Gary puts it.

They paint me as a rabid anti-Semite, who won't rest until every Jewish child is murdered. You just can't debate with Zionists, because when you write "Israeli troops target Palestinian civilians", they read "kill the Jew". There's just a total shut down, and inability to engage. Any media report about Israeli atrocities is down to media anti-Semitism, Palestinian lies, or both.

Most of the comments on the blog are written by hysterical ninnies, who claim that any attempt to establish a single, secular state will result in 'a second holocaust', that the Palestinians are this minute sharpening their knives for Jewish throats.

One of them claims that the occupied territories are being ruled by Israel through a UN mandate! And this is some one who wants me to 'read more on the topic' before I deign to have a say.

What other fantasies are lurking in the minds of the Zionists?

Well, a popular one is likening Palestinian fighters to the Nazis. One comment mentioned Arab collaboration with the Nazis before World War Two.

Yes, that's true, and it's a particularly unedifying bit of history. But guess what? The Zionists collaborated with the Nazis too!

There was even a medal struck to commemorate this:

The hypocrisy of it is nauseating too. The blog post was condemning COSATU's call for a boycott of Israel. But Israel has called for a world wide boycott of the elected leadership of the Palestinian territories, just because they don't like the outcome of the election.

I don't like the outcome either, but you can't claim to be a democrat and then refuse to accept the results of a democratic election.

When I likened Israel to apartheid South Africa - and their hysteria to Swart Gevaar - they assumed I was comparing the ANC to Hamas.

Do I need to spell it out? Criticism of Israel does not equal support for Islamists.

It's at times like this that anti-Zionist Jewish voices are important, whether they are Marxists like Yossi Schwartz, anarchists against the wall, religious groups or just Jews sans frontieres.

Distorting the truth

On the mother website of www.endtheoccupation.org.za there was a poster for one of their campaigns here it is

as you can see the palestinian boy is running from the Israeli tank immediately anyone would say "wow an Israeli tank rolling in and going after a poor kid" right?

Let me show you the real caption to this picture

What is this kid thinking ? or infact who told him to go do it? Who would have the balls to do something like this unless they know that Israelis do not fire at kids intentionally.

If anyone wants they can go to www.google.com and do a search throwing stones at tanks. and you will see countless amounts of similar pictures.

Seeing as I served in the Tank Corps of the IDF and due to driving in a built up area you would make smoke bellow from the exhaust to show your presence and therefore the picture would show smoke from the side( exhaust). I am thinking that this tank was not even running but in fact parked.

Kids have always been used as a sympathy tool, as the palestinians know that Israelis have a conscience and terrorists don't.

In this latest civil war in Gaza kids are idolising these gunmen

Should these kids not be at school maybe learning about peace and not violence? In all my years living in Israel I have never seen a similar case to this above picture.

In our country the ANC website had a link to www.endtheoccupation.org.za, this shows how linked our government is to a one sided bias opinion of the Arab-Israeli conflict. In our constitution it talks about equality and to be open minded about topics, here lies the hypocrisy of the ANC. How is it that they always defend the palestinians? Why do they never condemn the terrorists? Why is it always Israel's fault?

Is it not possible the militants are to blame?